tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7710325166074275740.post6379691027183118528..comments2023-04-02T10:44:21.551-05:00Comments on The Travis McGee Reader: Get lost, WashingtonJimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00034752526895428019noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7710325166074275740.post-26317710132334168812010-10-07T17:56:02.731-05:002010-10-07T17:56:02.731-05:00Typical, I bet half the legislators are stoners, a...Typical, I bet half the legislators are stoners, and they will get their act together eventually and write something - or have a lobbyist write it for them.NotClauswitzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14358707844087117280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7710325166074275740.post-34775611415538002282010-10-07T11:16:47.641-05:002010-10-07T11:16:47.641-05:00I just read the whole proposition, and you're ...I just read the whole proposition, and you're right. It had to have been written by a commitee in a state of collective altered consciousness. It does allow at least some current drug testing policies to continue, but the section you quote is important and could be a killer. <br /><br />Legalization must conform to the principle that a private employer has the right to require drug Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00034752526895428019noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7710325166074275740.post-65797778576631936862010-10-06T14:32:09.302-05:002010-10-06T14:32:09.302-05:00The problem with CA prop. 19 is it was written by ...The problem with CA prop. 19 is it was written by stoners, or legislators or stoned legislators (it's common) and goes too far and beyond Medical toe-in-the-door allowances. Per my man <a href="http://www.tommcclintock.com/blog/tom-mcclintock-on-the-propositions" rel="nofollow">Tom McClintock</a>, they overreach by insisting that, "no person shall be discriminated against or denied any NotClauswitzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14358707844087117280noreply@blogger.com