"We believe ... a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence," David said. "We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest."
"Modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence" justifies an illegal and violent home breakin for "no reason at all?"
We have fallen far from the roots of our liberties, from the vision of guys like William Pitt (the elder.)
"Modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence" justifies an illegal and violent home breakin for "no reason at all?"
We have fallen far from the roots of our liberties, from the vision of guys like William Pitt (the elder.)
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail -- its roof may shake -- the wind may blow through it -- the storm may enter -- the rain may enter -- but the King of England cannot enter! -- all his forces dare not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement!
Or is it declasse to remember what some of those old dead white guys said?
If anyone is collecting money to make air space over the Indiana Supreme Court a no-fly zone, put me down for a hundred bucks.
--
H/T Roberta