His lawyers waived a separate hearing on a Stand Your Ground defense, and ABC News headlined the stunning of "court observers."
Maybe some "observers" are more easily stunned than others. I doubt many students of self-defense law were even trickle-charged.
George Zimmerman shot and killed Trayvon Martin. Beyond that, the debate is open. If it was legally justifiable -- as it may have been -- it was on grounds other than Florida's Stand Your Ground law. Zimmerman left that legal cloak behind when he stopped his car, got out, and initiated the confrontation. A suspicious looking kid quietly walking through your night-time neighborhood is grounds for calling the cops, watching from a discreet distance, and taking steps to protect yourself in case he confronts you.
Zimmerman's self-defense argument will succeed or fail based on a judicial determination of what happened after he faced Martin and then, as he alleges, walked away. The details are in dispute and foggy. That's why we have courts.
Stand your ground law laws should be universal -- a simple affirmation of your right to use all necessary force to stay alive when a criminal threatens you. If we insist that they give full police power to every guy with a suspicion, we'll lose them, state-by-state.