A reader commented on the previous post, McGee Speaks:
Should we be stocking up on supplies before you start smashing, or is this just an offhand comment?
The paragraph is from The Green Ripper, written in 1978 or '79 about Travis' personal response to an act of terrorism. The threat MacDonald posited emanated from a perverted form of Christianity fronting for Communism and the same Middle-East forces which threaten us today. It is an ageless reflection on the relationship between advanced technology (running water, for instance) and increased societal vulnerability.
In a sense, it is also a reflection on people in general. On each new day our good lives depend a little more fully on competence and good will of of countless people we've never me. Air traffic controllers, guards and engineers of the power grid, internet enablers, the police system, a financial lashup which profits from general ignorance, the political system which has taken it on itself to ensure everything works and everyone happy.
So far, despite some horrible lapses, this has worked well enough in the First World, but there is a cost. The price is measured is units of self-sufficiency which are lost to a blind and unthinking reliance on the system and an almost universal negligence of personal Plans B, C, D, and beyond.
New Orleans died after a wholly predictable act of nature, and everyone blamed everyone else. Facebook went down last week and it was top-line news. Impure eggs got to market and a million words were expended advising the population to cook eggs, as though hundreds of millions of Americans were blind to the simple truths of the natural world, which is close enough to truth to frighten me.
Assuming the correctness of every biologist, anthropologist, ethicist I ever read that personal survival is the ultimate human drive, I wonder at the popular refusal to recognize the corollary: Living to see next month is a personal responsibility.
When the grid goes down are we ready with battery lamps, then kerosene lanterns, then candles, then twisted thistle fiber stuck in a clam shell of bacon grease? (Can you and your neighbors catch, kill, and butcher a hog, then render out the fat?)
When the water tower is empty do we have a pre-determined source of water, a way to carry it, store it, boil it? Do we have a personal plan to protect it when the police run away, speaking of New Orleans?
Against the day when the satellites go dark, do we have a map to replace the GPS, a personal library to fill in for the electric teevee -- not to mention the ability to converse with other humans when Sister Oprah is no longer our best friend and primary source of wisdom?
---
All that is part of what McGee was wondering about, as we should.
The "you" in your comment is misguided, perhaps unintentionally. The smashers are my enemy. Meyer the economist, in the same book, outlines a gloomy view of the near future. However:
"What the sane people people and sane governments are trying to do is scuffle a little more breathing space, a little more time before the collapse. ... I'm one of the scufflers. Cut and paste. Fix the world with paper clips and rubber bands."
Still, yes, I think it is a good idea to be laying in a few supplies. Starting in about 1992 if not earlier.
Libertarian thinking about everything. --Ere he shall lose an eye for such a trifle... For doing deeds of nature! I'm ashamed. The law is such an ass. -- G. Chapman, 1654.
Sep 27, 2010
Sep 26, 2010
McGee speaks
"I remember one of Meyer's concepts about cultural resiliency. In the third world , the village of one thousand can provide itself with what it needs for survival. Smash the cities and half the villages and the other half keeps going. In our world, the village of one thousand has to import water, fuel, food, clothing, medicine, electric power, and entertainment. Smash the cities and all the villages die. And the city itself is frail. It has little nerve-center nodules. Water plant, power transmission lines, telephone switching facilities."
Potential
I transcribe with exactitude from the auction bill:
"Mauser ModelK98K 709 mm rifle."
That would be a biggy, well into the NFA no-no class, eh?
I'll hit the sale anyway, mainly to look at the 6.35 Ortgies and the Winchester 102.
The alternative is mowing the lawn.
EDIT: All junk. Let some other fool have the stuff. One of them returned my missing "s" in return for my not bidding it up. :)
That would be a biggy, well into the NFA no-no class, eh?
I'll hit the sale anyway, mainly to look at the 6.35 Ortgies and the Winchester 102.
The alternative is mowing the lawn.
EDIT: All junk. Let some other fool have the stuff. One of them returned my missing "s" in return for my not bidding it up. :)
Sep 25, 2010
Welfare Queen
A real one, to wit:
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Head of the Commonwealth, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Duke of Normandy, Duke of Lancaster Lord of Mann and Paramount Chief of Fiji.
AKA Regina of the Chilly Toes, making us wonder if Phil might not have been behind this.
Liz applied for The Dole, heating assistance to chase the chill from the cold stone of Buckingham Palace.
That particular fund was designed to pay for warm schools and hospitals.
Her Majesty's government said, "Sure," then, egad, reneged and thwarted Royal Desire. It seems some spoilsport of a PUS got to thinking about those ever-so-disrespectful cads on Fleet Street.
"I also feel a bit uneasy about the probable adverse press coverage if the palace were given a grant at the expense of, say, a hospital," the official said.
Move to Britain. Apply for welfare. You'll meet such a nice class of people in the queue.
Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Head of the Commonwealth, Supreme Governor of the Church of England, Duke of Normandy, Duke of Lancaster Lord of Mann and Paramount Chief of Fiji.
AKA Regina of the Chilly Toes, making us wonder if Phil might not have been behind this.
Liz applied for The Dole, heating assistance to chase the chill from the cold stone of Buckingham Palace.
That particular fund was designed to pay for warm schools and hospitals.
Her Majesty's government said, "Sure," then, egad, reneged and thwarted Royal Desire. It seems some spoilsport of a PUS got to thinking about those ever-so-disrespectful cads on Fleet Street.
"I also feel a bit uneasy about the probable adverse press coverage if the palace were given a grant at the expense of, say, a hospital," the official said.
Move to Britain. Apply for welfare. You'll meet such a nice class of people in the queue.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)