Ladies and Gentlemen, I rant, briefly but wholeheartedly. Mediacom.
If you have a choice in the matter of high-speed internet connection and Mediacom is one of them, choose another. Move heaven and earth to choose another. Perhaps you will be fortunate enough to discover a provider which does not consider it a great personal favor to dependably deliver the cable signal for which you pay handsomely.
Since the choices around here are limited, I shall spend too much of tomorrow morning at the local Miserycom office, begging and pleading and groveling in hopes that someone there is (a) capable of and (b) cares enough to fix the expensive fubared SOB so that it stays fixed for a while.
This TMR report comes to you via a wussy neighborhood wireless signal, the oft-used rescue vessel for which I thank all the gods plus its rightful owner. Believe me, if you're on the Good Ship Mediapop, you need a life boat.
Aug 1, 2012
Jul 31, 2012
Go Ahead, Fed, Make My Day
The Bernanke Cloven meets today. I'll bet Ben doesn't know he is serving me, personally. He will continue the unacknowledged QE3 and further promise to keep interest rates low -- effectively zero -- for at least three more years. The two moves are different approaches to the same scam, creating money out of thin air and pretending it is wealth.
And that helps me make a decision on spending some savings on a new capital asset. Why? Because up until now I've always had to calculate interest on money I think I want to spend -- interest paid or interest earned.
Let's assume my little adventure costs $10,000, just to ease the arithmetic. The money would come from a "risk-free" account paying one-tenth of 1 per cent or $10 per year or 83 and one-third cents per month. Poor as I am, I can safely ignore that.
Over my adult years, interest available to Joe Sixpack ranged from about 4 per cent up to an amazing 10-or-15 per cent as the Carter debacle wound down. About ten years ago, $10,000 commanded something like 5 per cent, sometimes 6, depending on how carefully you shopped around for your CDs and other "safe" investments. That meant that the first cost of spending $10,000 was the $500 or $600 interest you lost. Call it $50 a month. Or call it a box of high-grade .45 ACP every week.
In any case, call it significant because, even at that late date in our economic history , Americans retained some faith that their government was attempting to manage our currency in a grown-up manner.
Up until approximately that point, we generally agreed that money was supposed to be worth something. We operated as though there should be some rational correspondence between the value of the dollar you hold today and the same dollar in your pocket one year from today. Misadventures such as Jimmy Carter and the savings-and-loan fiasco were viewed as aberrations. If that meant things like letting the seventh-largest bank in the country go bust, so be it.
The surest evidence that your savings represented actual wealth was the fact that people would pay for the use of it.
No more. The United States dollar is a deathbed case as a store of value. An apt comparison is a duplex in the heart of defeated Detroit. Neither commands a dime for its use, and a fresh coat of paint won't change that.
---
So, if everything else seems right, I'll spend because it seems stupendously foolish not to.
Meanwhile I'll listen raptly to the Great Debate as we choose our leaders for 2013 and beyond. The suspense is mortal. Was His Ineptness born feloniously in Kenya or merely ineptly in Hawaii? Did Mitt insult both the Brits and the Palestinians? Should we ban high-capacity magazines or gay marriage?
And that helps me make a decision on spending some savings on a new capital asset. Why? Because up until now I've always had to calculate interest on money I think I want to spend -- interest paid or interest earned.
Let's assume my little adventure costs $10,000, just to ease the arithmetic. The money would come from a "risk-free" account paying one-tenth of 1 per cent or $10 per year or 83 and one-third cents per month. Poor as I am, I can safely ignore that.
Over my adult years, interest available to Joe Sixpack ranged from about 4 per cent up to an amazing 10-or-15 per cent as the Carter debacle wound down. About ten years ago, $10,000 commanded something like 5 per cent, sometimes 6, depending on how carefully you shopped around for your CDs and other "safe" investments. That meant that the first cost of spending $10,000 was the $500 or $600 interest you lost. Call it $50 a month. Or call it a box of high-grade .45 ACP every week.
In any case, call it significant because, even at that late date in our economic history , Americans retained some faith that their government was attempting to manage our currency in a grown-up manner.
Up until approximately that point, we generally agreed that money was supposed to be worth something. We operated as though there should be some rational correspondence between the value of the dollar you hold today and the same dollar in your pocket one year from today. Misadventures such as Jimmy Carter and the savings-and-loan fiasco were viewed as aberrations. If that meant things like letting the seventh-largest bank in the country go bust, so be it.
The surest evidence that your savings represented actual wealth was the fact that people would pay for the use of it.
No more. The United States dollar is a deathbed case as a store of value. An apt comparison is a duplex in the heart of defeated Detroit. Neither commands a dime for its use, and a fresh coat of paint won't change that.
---
So, if everything else seems right, I'll spend because it seems stupendously foolish not to.
Meanwhile I'll listen raptly to the Great Debate as we choose our leaders for 2013 and beyond. The suspense is mortal. Was His Ineptness born feloniously in Kenya or merely ineptly in Hawaii? Did Mitt insult both the Brits and the Palestinians? Should we ban high-capacity magazines or gay marriage?
Jul 28, 2012
Piscine Porn (Olympics)
In blythe recognition of the swimming events.
Not attracted to scales? Okay.
Not attracted to scales? Okay.
Compiler's note: I could find nothing doing justice to this woman. Where were the talented studio still photographers?
So much for American exeptionalism
In London, Yi Siling of China shoots her way to The Gold, ahead of silver and bronze winners from Poland and somewhere else in China.
American daughters of Dan'l Boone and Sgt. York failed to place in the 10-meter (about 33 feet in real money) shoot. A shaken Pentagon has declined comment.
A word about the weapons.
Looks just like my Daisy Red Ryder would if I hired the staff of Tiger Balm Gardens to customize it.
American daughters of Dan'l Boone and Sgt. York failed to place in the 10-meter (about 33 feet in real money) shoot. A shaken Pentagon has declined comment.
A word about the weapons.
Looks just like my Daisy Red Ryder would if I hired the staff of Tiger Balm Gardens to customize it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)