Apr 26, 2012

Vintage Gun Porn in Progress

You would never do such a thing to a U.S. Springfield Model of 1903 today. Once upon a time, though, the gun world was tripping over them. In the 50s they traded for $20 or so, and every would-be gun smith in the country "sporterized" at least one.



In its original 1941 form it would have been a classic relic of a wild time in American history, the year we knew we would certainly have to fight Nazis and Fascists. And maybe Japanese.

It was the year when our recruits outnumbered our rifles. We turned to the private arms industry. This example, in the 3,1xx xxx range, was built by Remington on machinery from Rock Island Arsenal which had been in cosmoline for more than 20 years. It was still a 1903 in every important respect -- machined steel, walnut, no short cuts. Over the next two years the 03s evolved into the 1903A3 -- around serial number 3,300,000.

The barreled action came to me a number of years ago, already kitchen-tabled beyond restoration. Over the years I've ground, polished, and rebarreled  with an unissued 1944 High Standard tube. (Shortened to  22 inches.)

The auction-bargain stock is by Bishop, a utilitarian model, laughingly sold as "semi-inletted."  Indeed, by a distracted high school dropout swinging an Estwing.

But all yields to work, sharp chisels, and judicious use of Accraglas. You don't forget the evening the action slipped snugly into place and, at last, stayed right where it was as you tightened the stock screws.

Perhaps the walnut was not too utilitarian. A certain amount of figure appeared as the heavily oversized stock was trimmed, and it demanded an old-time finish. I used a few coats of warm and thinned linseed oil, rubbed in with the hands, then let it dry for a long time, days or weeks. I finished with plain old Johnson paste wax, as many coats as I have patience for. This one has about a dozen. When it gets smudgy a wipedown restores the subdued glow. When it gets thin it's time for another coat or two.

The pictures fail to do justice to last week's bluing work by a genius named Jeff.

It's not quite done. I'm unhappy with the aftermarket safety and will replace it. I haven't chosen the sighting system.  The Redfield peep would be in keeping with her heritage, but, then, so would the Weaver K4. We'll see.








(Click photos to enlarge.)

































6 comments:

DanH said...

I'm no judge of bluing, so I cannot comment there, but that is excellent work on the stock.

Stretch said...

You've inspired me.
My '03 is stock 1918 mil with a 10/42 two groove bbl. Definitely getting the proper 4 groove bbl. now. Thanks for sharing.

JohnW said...

Go with the Redfield.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, lots of work, but a Bishop stock worked well on my Enfield, back in 1951 or so. One MOA with a K2.5 on top. (Young eyes work better.)

My father had two Springfields that he sporterized. One wore a Stith Bear Cub 4X; the other a K6.

Stomper said...

Go with the Redfield. I have a Redfield 70K peep on my sporterized 1898 Krag rifle. Unless you plan on really working this rifle, the peep will be all the sight you need. Besides, everyone uses scopes nowadays; it takes skill to kill with irons.

Jim said...

Thanks, Dan. I'm no pro, but this one turned out reasonably well. The bluing, by the way,is far better than the photo shows. I used a studio light which handled the wood well but reflected from and washed out the steel -- not to mention it insisted on a slightly purple cast to the blue.

I'm drawn to the Redfields, too, but the one on hand requires inletting, and I'm nervous about hacking back into the walnut. Need to see what other peeps might work without more wood butchery.

Everyone: Thanks for the kind words.