.jpg) |
And not this Coop
This One
Who makes his living as a steely blue-eyed reporter for the Catatonic News Network where, last evening, he interviewed Zimmerman Juror B-37 and bombed.
Anderson in Duuhhh Moment No. 1: Did you know what went on out there that night?
Juror B-37: No one knew exactly what went on but (goes on to patiently explain what the evidence led jurors to believe occurred.)
Anderson, later, creating Duuhhh Moment No. 2: Did you know what went on out there that night?
Juror B-37: Look you brain-dead whack job, you need to either seek treatment for your short-term memory loss or stop doing interviews that last more than 40 seconds. It was a stupid question in the first place, but I answered it 'cuz I know I'm in a special-needs studio. Now I'm out of here. No, hold it. Why don't you stop picking your toes long enough to crack a dictionary and look up the meaning of "circumstantial."
4 comments:
Chuckle....excellent.
Poor little Vanderbilt boy.
AC was apparently trying to point out that no one knew what went on out there that night; not even the jurors.
Fine. Exactly the Point AC !
It is called Reasonable Doubt.
The EVIDENCE tends to support the statements or version told by Zimmerman.
If there any doubt; that whole "Rather 10 guilty men go free rather than 1 innocent go to jail" comes into play.
I do like your version of the reply though....wish people could get back to being that direct again.
Thanks, Stephen.
Bob: I don't want to take on the arrogance of the Zimmerman prosecutors -- claiming to know the precise state of someone else's mind. I watched Cooper's reporting many times throughout the trial, however, and conclude that he finds the verdict wrong and is anxious to discredit it. Fully prepared to concede that your perspective may be as valid as mine, I still see him as Al Sharpton, lite.
In this case, it seemed his objective was to emphasize jury ignorance and suggest reasonable doubt should have been resolved in favor of the hapless presecutors.
Post a Comment