Oct 19, 2010

Iowa Concealed Carry Reciprocity

You can whiz through the Hawkeye State on I-80 secure in the knowledge that we'll honor your CCW, even if you're using it to cover that souvenir switchblade you haggled for down in Tampico back in '72. 


The  Iowa DPS FAQ on the new shall-issue law (effective Jan 1, 2011) says:


with an Iowa issued permit. 


Now,suppose you get nabbed by a cop charged with assessing the speed tax. You are not required to tell him you are armed, but the DPS thinks you should:




QUESTION: If I am stopped by a law enforcement officer in Iowa, am I required to declare that I am carrying a loaded firearm? 

ANSWER: No, but it is really good idea. Iowa law does not require such a declaration; however, as a safety measure for both the 
permit holder and the officer, making such a declaration voluntarily is recommended and encouraged. 

You handle it your way. Personally I would would make damned sure I was talking to an actual officer rather than a costume shop customer then tell him or her if I had a weapon on my person. If the gun was tucked away in the glove box I probably wouldn't bother. Why extend a conversation you didn't want in the first place?

Oct 18, 2010

Iowa Concealed Carry, Open Carry

We're a couple of months away from the  effective date of Iowa's new shall-issue law, and the Department of Public Safety has issued a FAQ on how it will work. For a government publication, it's remarkably straight forward.

Among other things it clarifies the open-carry issue. With a carry permit, you may carry concealed or openly in cities and towns despite any local legislation. The wording is:


QUESTION: Under the new law, do I have to carry my handgun concealed? 
ANSWER: Iowa law has not changed in this regard. You may carry concealed or you may carry openly; however, most permit holders 
carry concealed to avoid making it obvious that the person is armed, thus avoiding unnecessary attention, concern, or alarm. 

The expiring may-issue law did permit open carry in cities for CCW holders, but it held a hemlock dose. Sheriffs could jerk your mother-may-I  for any reason, including offending the sensibilities of your fellow Target shoppers with a visible weapon.

That said, I rather like the FAQ wording. It confirms your right but suggests that you might want to exercise it with a bit of discretion to avoid numerous and monotonous discussions with peace officers summoned by the nervous.   

Which raises the question of businesses' right to ban guns. Iowa law remains silent on the subject, and I expect the issue to be litigated sooner rather than later. Just as it has elsewhere, it pits the right of a business to control things on its own property against your right to defend yourself anywhere.  

(more)
I would be less unchurched  if my clergy person was  the the Reverend Mary Edwards, of Collingbourne Ducis, near Marlborough, on the Plains of Salisbury in Merry Olde.

Something of a scholar, she discovered that her commission included the right to muster her parishioners  for practice with lethal weapons in defense of the realm. And so,  this spring, she did just that.

Mrs Edwards said: "It's an unrepealed law from some time in the middle ages and I can call all the men - but I've extended it to all people - in the parish to archery practice."

And I am here to tell you that this woman knows how to command a militia.

"Residents were rewarded for complying with the law with a bar, a barbecue and live music."


The occasion for the bending of the yew was completion of an indoor loo, the church's first.

The extent of diaper dampening in Parliament is thus far unreported.


---


As a descendant of Fearghael of Longford in Leinster, or perhaps Fearghael of the wild Wicklow Mountains,  I find myself suspecting  -- or  perhaps merely hoping -- that  her pedigree begins somewhere in Hibernia.

Oct 17, 2010

Sunday Sermon: The Tea Party Goes to Washington

Dearly Beloved of the Tea Party:

The Democrats have thrown in the towel. The president  is making his excuses pre factum. The national Democrats  circle the money wagons, pulling cash from dozens of races once thought competitive.  They recognize that votes are commercial commodities, and they can't afford many of them, so they desperately defend the 40 acres around the homestead in hopes of living to fight another day.

So the "conservatives," the Republicans, and  the Tea Party  will win. I haven't read anyone, high or low, who can articulate a plausible event which would  change this.

Welcome to power and Gordian knot of how to use it.

Oh, I know you'll begin with the ego trip of trying to snag preferable offices in the Rayburn and  Hart buildings. You'll direct your handlers to lobby for the committee assignments most likely to attract the teevee cameras to your angelic faces.  You'll almost immediately have a thousand bills drafted, proposals going nowhere except, via posturing, pandering,  news releases to your district  newspaper desks.

Having won your seats by vilifying Washington and its politicians you will, before the cherry blossoms bloom again,  have become Washington politicians,  sharing the breed lust to remain one.

The troubling thing is that, as a group, however loosely organized,  you have no more coherent message than the scoundrels you replace. The mantra of "lower taxes, smaller government"  -- an outstanding idea -- flows trippingly from the tongue and meets loving ears among the over-taxed, over-policed, over-regulated American citizenry. Unfortunately it collides between those ears, on the rock of "where's mine?".

Meaning what are you going to do after you abolish the Department of Education? (Another good idea.) A significant number of you are winning less because you have workable notions about  how to restore liberties and more because you have rekindled the hopes of the window-peeping theocrats.  So you will think seriously about  the fund-raising and electoral benefits of a gay marriage amendment, a Constitutional ban on flag burning, a positive assertion that teachers must lead public classroom prayers.

Given another primary source of  your vote-buying money, you can't fail to sympathize with the welfare queens represented by the Farm Bureau, the National Federation of Independent Business, the Chambers of Commerce, the American Bankers Association.  After all, the next election cycle starts about the time you hire the first meat to staff your office.

Redistributing honestly earned wealth is both morally wrong and economically destructive whether the pigs you feed are coke moms  breeding for DHS  checks or Hank Greenburg's insurance giants.

The chattering media have been faithful about attaching the term "libertarian-leaning" to your Tea Party.  We will shortly know whether they know what they are talking about and, in the unlikely event they do,  whether you mean it.

As  any simple Bob Jones U graduate knows, all sermons should conclude with an exhortation, a plea for holiness, an invitation to sign on the dotted line.

Here's mine: Please cleave to the notion that The United States of America is not really a place, wonderful though that place is. It is not an adaptation of Roberts Rules of Order, however important procedures may be. America is an idea, and that idea is liberty, the ultimate sovereignty of the individual human being in his private affairs.