But a giggler over at WND, proves they can be fun, especially if you happen to be a cynical Obama skeptic.
The Zogby poll reports Obama would lose an election held today. Among the sub-results:
People who pay federal income tax would vote for someone else 53-40.
People who do not pay tax prefer Obama 49-42.
Gun owners would vote for someone else, 68-26
----
*Miss Hilton do you consider it likely or unlikely that CERN will identify a Higgs boson?
**Therefore President Barack Obama is the choice of unarmed hippy diaper dampeners on welfare.
----
Ed Newman summed up his views with: "Ask not to know on whom the poll palls; it palls on me."
1 comment:
Excessive polling is only necessary because of general fund, fuzzy accounting in government. It used to be that a particular purpose was established, a cost estimate was made, and a tax was levied to finance a project. It's pretty simple to guess the mood of the electorate when a project is a disaster.
My question is this: Is there any difference between taxation without representation, and taxation without purpose? Congress isn't so much exercising a power to tax to the ends of its constitutional duties as it is extorting an allowance to use at its sole discretion.
Post a Comment